We got tired of paying three vendors for one project

Tasks in one tool, hours in another, invoices in a third — and a client emailing for a status update that already existed in all three. So we built the thing we wanted.

What we believe

Features should not be hostages. Charging extra for a Gantt chart in 2026 is a pricing tactic, not a product decision. Everything we build ships to every plan, including the free one. The paid tiers exist for scale, security and support — not to ration basic functionality.

Guests should never cost money. Clients, contractors and stakeholders need to see the work. If access costs a seat, you ration it, and then you spend your week writing status emails instead. Viewers are unlimited and free, forever.

Time tracking belongs in the project tool. The estimate, the actual and the invoice are the same conversation. Splitting them across three products is how agencies lose margin without noticing.

Speed is a feature you feel every day. Each screen loads from one bootstrap request. There is no client-side framework shipping megabytes before you can read a task title. The app works on a train.

Your data is yours. One click exports everything as JSON and CSV. We would rather you could leave easily and choose to stay.

How we make money

Subscriptions, billed through Paddle as merchant of record. That is the whole model: no data resale, no ads, no "AI credits" upsell designed to bite. If you outgrow the free plan you pay us; if you do not, the free plan keeps working. We publish our prices, our limits and our competitors' prices on the same page because the comparison favours us.

Why the pricing is this low

Two reasons, both self-interested. First, market share: a tool with a genuinely useful free tier and a $4 paid tier spreads through teams and agencies faster than one that opens with a sales call. Second, cost structure: we run a lean stack with no per-seat vendor costs of our own, so a workspace with 25 people costs us barely more to serve than one with 8. Per-seat pricing at $18 would be pure margin, not necessity.

The trade we are making is explicit: lower price now, price locked for early adopters, and we bet on volume.

What we are not

We are not the right tool if you need deeply customised Jira workflow schemes with validators and post-functions, a marketplace of 3,000 apps, or an enterprise procurement process with a named account team on day one. Those are real needs and other vendors serve them well. We say so on every comparison page.

Talk to us

Email [email protected]. A human replies, usually within a business day, and the person who replies can usually change the product.